Complete formal verification proofs for SNIF (ABI-1 through ABI-5, TP-1, TP-2)#1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…1..2) Replace RSR template proof scaffolds with SNIF-specific constructive proofs covering the WASM FFI boundary. No banned patterns used. ABI-1 (Pointers): WasmAddr bounded memory index, SafePtr non-null witness, MemRegion with start/end bounds proofs ABI-2 (Layout): WasmValType sizes/alignment, natural alignment proof, StructField framework for future array-passing ABI-3 (Platform): WASM32 Zig-to-WASM type correspondence (zigWasmSizeMatch), page alignment, pointer sizes ABI-4 (Foreign): All 8 SNIF export specs with return type and arity proofs, IsCrashFunction classifier, SNIFResult functor laws ABI-5 (Compliance): ScalarABICompliant for all exports, AllScalarCompliant aggregate, WasmArrayValid for future FFT TP-1 (Types): WasmTrapKind with full DecEq, SNIFCallResult sum type with disjointness, CompilationMode SafeForSNIF invariant (ADR-001), BeamSurvived crash isolation theorem TP-2 (ApiTypes.lean): SNIFResult functor+monad laws (5 theorems), beam_always_survives, compilation mode safety proofs PROOF-STATUS.md updated: 0% -> 100% (7/7 proofs complete). https://claude.ai/code/session_01PyMCjzc5tqZJ22qG5azG4Y
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR completes all 7 formal verification proofs for the SNIF (Safe NIF) architecture, achieving 100% proof coverage. The proofs establish type safety, ABI compliance, and crash isolation guarantees for the WASM-to-Elixir FFI boundary.
Closes #SNIF-PROOFS
Changes
ABI Proofs (5 modules)
ABI-1 (Pointers): Non-null pointer safety for WASM linear memory addresses and host-side handles. Proves
WasmAddrbounds invariants andSafePtrnon-null constraints.ABI-2 (Layout): Memory layout correctness for WASM value types (i32, i64, f32, f64). Proves size (4 or 8 bytes), natural alignment, and padding arithmetic.
ABI-3 (Platform): Platform-specific type size proofs. Establishes Zig i32/i64/usize → WASM value type correspondence on WASM32 target. Proves WASM page alignment and max memory bounds.
ABI-4 (Foreign): FFI function return type proofs for all 8 SNIF exports (fibonacci, checked_add, 5 crash functions, still_alive). Proves each function's parameter arity and return type matches the Zig source.
ABI-5 (Compliance): C ABI compliance for scalar-only exports. Proves all 8 functions are trivially C ABI compliant (no struct layout concerns). Establishes framework for future array-passing extensions (FFT).
Typing Proofs (2 modules)
TP-1 (Types, Idris2): Core data type well-formedness. Defines and proves properties of
WasmTrapKind(6 trap classifications),SNIFCallResult(sum type for call outcomes),CompilationMode(Zig optimization modes with safety invariants), and bounded integer types.TP-2 (ApiTypes, Lean4): Public API type safety. Proves
SNIFResultfunctor and monad laws (map_id, map_comp, bind_left_id, bind_right_id, bind_assoc). Proves BEAM survival theorem: the BEAM process always survives any SNIF call outcome (ok, trap, or load error).Documentation
PROOF-STATUS.md: All 7 proofs marked complete with file locations, dates, and verification methods.RSR Quality Checklist
Required
unsafeblocks (proofs are pure)believe_me,sorry,Admitted— all proofs are constructive)As Applicable
PROOF-STATUS.mdupdated (proof completion tracking)safe_nif.zigexports)Testing
All proofs are verified by the Idris2 and Lean4 type checkers:
idris2 --check verification/proofs/idris2/ABI/*.idr verification/proofs/idris2/Types.idrlean4 verification/proofs/lean4/ApiTypes.leanType-checking is the verification method for formal proofs; no runtime tests are applicable.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01PyMCjzc5tqZJ22qG5azG4Y